Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

MPs call Green Deal energy loan program 'abysmal'


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

The government’s energy efficiency loan scheme had an “abysmal” take-up rate because it had not been tested with consumers, MPs have said.
garage ceiling insulation board
The “Green Deal” ended last year after providing just £50m in 14,000 loans to households to boost energy efficiency.
That was far less than the £1.1bn predicted by the government, with each loan costing taxpayers £17,000.
In a highly critical report, the Public Accounts Committee said projections for the scheme were “wildly optimistic”.
The MPs said the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s figures gave a completely misleading picture of the scheme’s prospects to Parliament.
The committee urged the government to learn from the mistakes made with the scheme, which provided loans to meet costs of installing efficiency measures that householders repaid from savings on their energy bills.
When the scheme was introduced in 2013, it had not been adequately tested with consumers, the report said.
“Householders were not persuaded that energy efficiency measures were worth paying for through the Green Deal and take-up of loans was abysmal,” MPs said.
It was too complex, with excessive paperwork, while people were also put off by interest rates of up to 10% on the loans – far more expensive than other lending, the report said.
Marketing also focused on the financial benefits of installing energy-efficiency measures, rather than emphasizing the comfort of having a well-insulated, energy-efficient home, which may have interested more people, according to the report.

‘Truly dismal’

Committee chairwoman Meg Hillier said: “Not enough work went into establishing the scheme’s appeal to households, nor to its implementation, nor to examining the experience of governments setting up similar schemes overseas.
“This blinkered approach resulted in a truly dismal take-up for green deal loans and a cost to taxpayers of £17,000 for every loan arranged.”
The Department for Energy spent £240m on the scheme, including £25m in loans to the Green Deal.
The committee also criticised another scheme, the Energy Company Obligation (ECO), which required big energy firms to make homes more efficient.
MPs found the government was unable to determine whether the scheme helped to reduce fuel poverty.
The UK’s 27 million homes account for more than a quarter of the total energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. The housing stock is among the least energy efficient in Europe, which meant higher energy bills, harm to the environment and poorer health for those living in colder homes.
A spokesperson for the new Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said: “This government took action last year by stopping public funding to the Green Deal Finance Company and setting up an independent review of the energy efficiency sector.
“The lessons that we have learnt will help us to develop simpler, better value for money policies, targeting people who need support most.”

Key points:

Our badly insulated and managed houses consume 25% of the UKs total energy.
Government schemes are usually badly run and badly thought out and hugely expensive.

Share:

More Posts

tesla_model_3_LR

Tesla launch Model 3 Long Range

Tesla launch new longer range Model 3 Now on sale Tesla offer a model 3 rear wheel drive with the larger battery pack that will get you 436 miles. The cars sits between the base RWD and the AWD long range model and costs £44,990, half way between the two other models. We don’t know

Solar PV Production Sept 2024

254 kWh Produced in September 2024 with 71 kWh exported September 2024 – Summer fades quickly and rain becomes all too common during the month. There are many days with little or no sun.  The total for the month is far less than expectations but well below September 2023 when we produced over 350 kWh.

Tesla 3 and Y

Tesla September 2024 UK price update – No change for 17 months.

Tesla Model 3 and Model Y pricing remain unchanged during September 2024, making 17 months of no increase to UK retail pricing. Model 3 price reduced by £3,000 during October 2023. Model 3 base price remains at £39,990 and Model Y at £44,990. Model 3 Performance now available to order from £59,990. This is great

tesla cybertruck production

Tesla Q3 Deliveries

Q3 2024 Production, Deliveries & Deployments Tesla reported third-quarter vehicle deliveries of 462,890 In line with estimates of 463,000. Production of 470,000 vehicles Plus 6.9 GWh of energy products Highlights Tesla shares fell on Tuesday after the company reported vehicle deliveries in line with expectations and about 6% growth YonY. Not enough to keep Wall St

Send Us A Message