Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

MPs call Green Deal energy loan program 'abysmal'


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/evinfo.info/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/dynamic-tags/tags/post-featured-image.php on line 39

The government’s energy efficiency loan scheme had an “abysmal” take-up rate because it had not been tested with consumers, MPs have said.
garage ceiling insulation board
The “Green Deal” ended last year after providing just £50m in 14,000 loans to households to boost energy efficiency.
That was far less than the £1.1bn predicted by the government, with each loan costing taxpayers £17,000.
In a highly critical report, the Public Accounts Committee said projections for the scheme were “wildly optimistic”.
The MPs said the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s figures gave a completely misleading picture of the scheme’s prospects to Parliament.
The committee urged the government to learn from the mistakes made with the scheme, which provided loans to meet costs of installing efficiency measures that householders repaid from savings on their energy bills.
When the scheme was introduced in 2013, it had not been adequately tested with consumers, the report said.
“Householders were not persuaded that energy efficiency measures were worth paying for through the Green Deal and take-up of loans was abysmal,” MPs said.
It was too complex, with excessive paperwork, while people were also put off by interest rates of up to 10% on the loans – far more expensive than other lending, the report said.
Marketing also focused on the financial benefits of installing energy-efficiency measures, rather than emphasizing the comfort of having a well-insulated, energy-efficient home, which may have interested more people, according to the report.

‘Truly dismal’

Committee chairwoman Meg Hillier said: “Not enough work went into establishing the scheme’s appeal to households, nor to its implementation, nor to examining the experience of governments setting up similar schemes overseas.
“This blinkered approach resulted in a truly dismal take-up for green deal loans and a cost to taxpayers of £17,000 for every loan arranged.”
The Department for Energy spent £240m on the scheme, including £25m in loans to the Green Deal.
The committee also criticised another scheme, the Energy Company Obligation (ECO), which required big energy firms to make homes more efficient.
MPs found the government was unable to determine whether the scheme helped to reduce fuel poverty.
The UK’s 27 million homes account for more than a quarter of the total energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions. The housing stock is among the least energy efficient in Europe, which meant higher energy bills, harm to the environment and poorer health for those living in colder homes.
A spokesperson for the new Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said: “This government took action last year by stopping public funding to the Green Deal Finance Company and setting up an independent review of the energy efficiency sector.
“The lessons that we have learnt will help us to develop simpler, better value for money policies, targeting people who need support most.”

Key points:

Our badly insulated and managed houses consume 25% of the UKs total energy.
Government schemes are usually badly run and badly thought out and hugely expensive.

Share:

More Posts

Orsted wind

Ørsted pullS plug on the Hornsea 4 Wind project

Orsted cancel plans to build a huge wind farm in the North Sea Ørsted pulled the plug on the Hornsea 4 project off the east of England on Wednesday as it blamed rising costs and interest rates. The scheme would have seen 180 giant turbines built off the Yorkshire coast providing 2.4 gigawatts (GW) of

april 2025

April Solar production

Over 500 kWh Produced in April 2025 – Sun most day. Shock. What = April 2025 was warm, sunny and ar times nearly hot. In huge contract to gloomy Feb and March, April stands out as spectualy sunny.  The graphs show 2024 gave 325 kWh and 2023 375 kWh. So 500 is a significant jump.

iphone 16

Latest iPhone Success Is A First For Apple

Apple takes #1 spot in Q1 2025 for Smart Phone Sales Research for Counterpoint shows that the global smartphone market grew by 3% in the first quarter of 2025, driven by growth in emerging markets and “a subsidy-led demand boost in China,” it said.  The research went on to mention the thing that has never

Macan EV Turbo front

Review: 2025 Porsche Macan EV Turbo – Electric PowerED SUV Meets Porsche DNA

Macan Turbo EV The wait is over. Porsche has finally pulled the wraps off the all-electric Macan EV Turbo, and after spending some time behind the wheel, it’s clear: this isn’t just a Macan with a battery. It’s the future of Porsche’s compact SUV — and it’s everything we hoped for. First Impressions Let’s get

Send Us A Message